
A single drum dryer is a heat exchanger with a burner bolted to one end, and buyers spend most of the evaluation on the drum. The heat is where the money is. Coal, natural gas and waste heat all reach the 700–800 °C inlet that the published sheet allows, and on the same duty they can differ by a factor of two or more in running cost and by a much larger factor in what has to be built around the drum.
The comparison is only meaningful per tonne of water evaporated, because that is the unit the physics fixes. A dryer removing 2.8 t of water an hour and one removing 8 t are not comparable on fuel per hour. Start from the gigajoules, convert to whichever fuel is on site, then add the equipment each source drags in with it.
The three options do not differ only in price per gigajoule. Each arrives with a different temperature, a different equipment list and a different relationship with the product inside the drum.
| Source | Usable gas temperature | Added equipment | Product risk | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coal | 700–900 °C from a hot gas generator, blended to 700–800 °C | Combustion chamber, fuel yard, ash handling, larger collector | Fly ash and iron-bearing particulate enter the product | Full control, subject to fuel supply |
| Natural gas | Burner flame well above 1,000 °C, blended to 700–800 °C | Burner train, pressure regulation, supply or LNG storage | Low ash; clean combustion gas | Full control, subject to contract and price |
| Waste heat | 250–400 °C; cement kiln preheater gas is commonly 300–350 °C | Duct, booster fan, tempering air damper, bypass stack | Inherits the host gas: dust, sulphur, moisture | Tied to host run hours |
How to read this table: the temperature bands are typical of each source rather than published limits of this machine. The drum itself publishes a maximum inlet of 700–800 °C, which all three can satisfy — but they satisfy it in different ways, and the waste-heat route satisfies it only after the gas has been diluted with air, which costs volume rather than temperature.
Coal at 23 MJ/kg and 85% combustion efficiency is about $3.90 per gigajoule at $90 a tonne, or $4.60 once the unburned fraction is counted. Natural gas at 35.8 MJ/Nm³ and 98% is about $11.20 per gigajoule at $0.40 a cubic metre, or $11.40 once combustion is counted. The gap is roughly two and a half to one, and that gap is the entire argument for coal.
What the gap buys is equipment. A coal-fired drum needs a hot gas generator with a combustion chamber, a fuel yard and handling, ash removal, and a dust collector sized for both the extra gas and the ash load. It needs a fuel analysis, because 5,500 kcal is an assumption and the delivered coal may be 4,800 with 12% ash and 1% sulphur. And it puts combustion products in direct contact with the material, which is fine for slag, sand, clay for brick and fly ash, and wrong for anything where brightness or whiteness is the specification — a point that matters on kaolin, where the temperature recipe is already tight.
Gas removes the yard, the ash and the ash-related collector load. The burner train is compact, turndown is wide, and the flame is clean enough to dry a white mineral without a colour complaint. The cost is per gigajoule, and it is volatile: the same burner that looks reasonable at $0.25 a cubic metre is expensive at $0.55, and a dryer sized on a cheap contract can be stranded when the contract ends.
The compensation is that gas heat is easy to modulate, which matters on a drum that has to hold a discharge temperature rather than a flame. On a product with a 550–600 °C structural limit, the ability to cut heat quickly is worth something in scrap product avoided, and this is where the fuel choice stops being only an energy decision.
Waste heat is the cheapest heat in the world once the duct exists, and it is the reason so many dryers are bolted onto plants that already have a hot stack. What it is not is free of consequence. Heat delivered at 300 °C carries far less energy per kilogram than heat at 700 °C, so the same gigajoules require far more gas — and the drum, duct, fan and bag filter are all sized on gas volume.
| Inlet gas °C | Drop to 110 °C outlet (K) | Gas per t of water (t) | Volume at outlet per t of water (m³) | Fan energy per t of water (kWh) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 300 | 190 | 21.3 | 11,800 | 12.6 |
| 350 | 240 | 16.9 | 9,300 | 10.0 |
| 400 | 290 | 14.0 | 7,700 | 8.2 |
| 700 | 590 | 6.9 | 3,800 | 4.1 |
How to read this table: all five columns are calculated on 4.25 GJ per tonne of water, 1.05 kJ/(kg·K) for the gas, a 110 °C outlet and a 2.5 kPa system pressure drop with a 65% fan efficiency. The last column is the honest cost of free fuel: at 300 °C the fan uses roughly three times the electricity per tonne of water that it does at 700 °C, and the bag filter handles three times the volume. A waste-heat drying system is a fuel saving and a fan bill, not a saving with no bill.
There is a second constraint that never appears in the fuel comparison: availability. Kiln preheater gas exists while the kiln runs. If the dryer must run 24 hours through a kiln shutdown, it needs a backup burner — and then two heat sources have been bought, with two sets of safety interlocks and two sets of operating procedures.

Put the three on one line, at example prices, and the ranking is clear — as long as the prices are replaced with local ones before any decision is taken.
| Source | Fuel per t water | Example unit price | Fuel cost per t water | Fan and ancillary | Example total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coal | 217 kg | $90/t | $19.50 | about $0.40 | about $20 |
| Natural gas | 121 m³ | $0.40/m³ | $48.40 | about $0.40 | about $49 |
| Waste heat at 300 °C | none | — | $0 | about $1.30 | about $1.30 |
How to read this table: electricity is priced at $0.10/kWh and the fan figures come from the volume column above; the coal and gas prices are illustrative only and vary widely by market. What does not vary is the shape: coal is the cheapest purchased heat per gigajoule, gas is roughly two and a half times dearer, and waste heat converts the fuel line into a fan line. On a line evaporating 4 t of water an hour, running 8,000 hours a year, that is about 32,000 t of water and a difference of roughly $925,000 a year — against which the gas installation saves the fuel yard, the ash handling and the collector load.
Delivered gas temperature and volume at the mixing point, not at the burner. Fuel analysis — calorific value, ash, sulphur, moisture. Outlet gas temperature and the dew point margin behind it. Turndown ratio, because a dryer spends most of its life part-loaded. Annual availability of the source in hours, which decides whether a backup burner is in the scope. Add the dust loading of any waste gas, since that decides the collector. The sizing arithmetic on the drum side is set out in what one ton of water costs to evaporate, and the drum itself is described on the Single Cylinder Dryer page; where the product has a temperature ceiling, the setpoints in the kaolin temperature guide apply before any fuel is chosen.

Q1: Which heat source is cheapest to run?
A: At coal $90/t and gas $0.40/m³, coal costs about $20 per tonne of water and gas about $49, before the fuel yard and ash handling that coal requires. Waste heat is fuel-free but pays about $1.30 in fan power at 300 °C. Local prices can reverse the coal and gas ranking; they rarely touch the waste-heat case where the gas already exists.
Q2: Can waste heat reach the 700–800 °C the drum allows?
A: Rarely. Kiln preheater gas is commonly 300–350 °C. The drum does not need 700 °C to work — it needs the heat — but low-temperature gas means roughly three times the mass flow and volume, so the fan, ducts and bag filter all grow. That is the capital cost of free fuel.
Q3: Does a single drum accept all three sources?
A: Yes. The published maximum inlet is 700–800 °C, which a coal or gas hot gas generator reaches after blending with tempering air, and waste heat sits well below it. What changes is the burner or duct arrangement, not the drum.
Q4: Do I need a bigger dust collector if I burn coal?
A: On two counts. Combustion adds ash to the gas stream, and blending a hot gas generator down to the drum inlet adds air volume. Both show up as collector area and fan power, and both belong in the coal-versus-gas comparison rather than in a footnote.

About of Mascot
Zhengzhou Mascot Industry is a high-tech mining equipment company integrating R&D, manufacturing, sales, and after-sales service. Focusing on crushing, grinding, and mineral processing equipment, we provide professional solutions to our customers. We are ISO9001:2015 certified, and our products include mobile crushing plants, crawler crushing plant, construction waste crushing plants, jaw crushers, sand making machines, cone crushers, fine crushers, grinding mills, ball mills, etc., all with reliable performance to meet diverse project needs.
• Professional pre-sales support: Free project design and comprehensive solutions to help you accurately select the right equipment;
• Comprehensive on-site service: Providing installation guidance and worker training to ensure smooth equipment commissioning;
• Reliable after-sales guarantee: A complete after-sales system, timely response to technical inquiries and equipment maintenance, ensuring long-term stable operation.
To protect your rights, please contact us through the following official channels for professional service:
WhatsApp: 0086-16650273865
Email: mascot@mascotenv.com
We are committed to providing high-quality equipment and full-cycle services to deliver comprehensive intelligent solutions for the global mining industry!

The Raymond mill production line is a highly efficient system designed for grinding operations, with a focus on energy efficiency, durability, and productivity. It caters to the needs of users by offering fine powder products in non-metallic ores, coal powder, and slag processing, aiding enterprises in achieving sustainable growth.

YGMX Enhanced High-Pressure Mill is a new type of high-performance grinding equipment, and the biggest improvement of this milling equipment lies in the increase of the high-pressure spring system in the grinding roller part. Compared with the traditional high-pressure roller mill, it has a wider scope of application and excellent performance to meet the production needs of a variety of powder fineness. It is widely used in non-metallic minerals, chemicals, building materials, metallurgy, environmental protection, etc. Multiple areas.

The gypsum grinding production line is an efficient, stable, and environmentally friendly production solution, which is widely used in construction, decoration, the chemical industry, and other fields. In addition, the grinding process is particularly critical, which directly affects the quality and particle size of the final product. With the continuous development of science and technology, the technical level and production efficiency of gypsum grinding production lines will be further improved, providing strong support for the development of the gypsum processing industry.

The ball mill production line is a comprehensive production line that integrates material crushing, grinding, grading, and collection. This production line is mainly used to process various materials, including sand and gravel, cement, new building materials, silicates, refractory materials, fertilizers, ferrous metal beneficiation, non-ferrous metals, glass ceramics, etc.

The MTW series European grinding mill production line includes high-efficiency crushers, elevators, electromagnetic vibration feeders, milling machines, classifiers, and collectors. These pieces of equipment work together to achieve efficient crushing, grinding, and classification of various non-metallic ores, coal powder, slag, and other materials. It can meet the diverse needs of various industries for powder particle size, uniformity, shape, etc., and offer enterprises high-quality grinding products.
Green and Intelligent Mining Machinery
Manufacturing and Export Base
Based on high quality and perfect after-sales service, our products have been
exported to more than 120 countries and regions.